Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
After a spell on the NLL sampling a 378 yesterday, I headed towards home via
Willesden Junction and the West London Line. (Incidentally, I was very impressed with the Gospel Oak - where I boarded - 'Overground effect'. Bright, well staffed, clean, felt safe etc. A far cry from the Gospel Oak I remember of yore - closed booking office, dirty, broken down Bubble Cars on the GOBLIN etc). Willesden - Clapham was a 313, being the 'new trains' we are expecting shortly in Brighton. 3-NOL? Having started pretty well loaded, we were overwhelmed by the Westfield crowd at Shepherds Bush. Predominantly well-heeled looking young couples, returning with lots of boutique-style bags to Battersea, Wandsworth and the nicer bits of Surrey, I imagine. Not sure what to make of this, really. On the one hand, it's clear Westfield must have a significant public transport penetration. Much better than the public transport disaster which is Lakeside. On the other hand, you can't shop in two places at the same time, so somewhere else must be hurting badly. Oxford Street, perhaps - and *yet again* much of central London surface transport was seriously disrupted by a march. But the tourists should keep zone 1 shopping in good health, so it must be the high streets feeling the pain. Real crush loading on leaving Olympia. The real surprise, for me, was Imperial Wharf. I expected very little patronage, the parallel being some of the stations on the DLR extensions in the early days. In fact, in my carriage alone, I reckon about 30 alighted. As we pulled into Clapham, a sizeable throng were waiting to board, albeit swelled by the Chelsea football crowd. Not the quiet backwater I remember from a decade or more ago. I imagine, as Christmas shopping ramps up, there will be people unable to board at Shepherds Bush. Does this happen already? God forbid that IKEA open a place at/near Westfield, and pax try to struggle on with self-assembly wardrobes etc........ Chris |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Read wrote:
After a spell on the NLL sampling a 378 yesterday, I headed towards home via Willesden Junction and the West London Line. Willesden - Clapham was a 313, being the 'new trains' we are expecting shortly in Brighton. 3-NOL? Having started pretty well loaded, we were overwhelmed by the Westfield crowd at Shepherds Bush. [...] Real crush loading on leaving Olympia. The real surprise, for me, was Imperial Wharf. I expected very little patronage, the parallel being some of the stations on the DLR extensions in the early days. In fact, in my carriage alone, I reckon about 30 alighted. As we pulled into Clapham, a sizeable throng were waiting to board, albeit swelled by the Chelsea football crowd. Not the quiet backwater I remember from a decade or more ago. Yes, it's phenomenal, isn't it. Your experience matches mine, posted here a couple of weeks back. Someone should be congratulated for recognising there was going to be a good demand for this service, and then chastised for so severely underestimating it. -- http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p9683850.html (159 004 at Reading, 7 Jun 1995) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
You could argue that the planning requirements are therefore working. There were substantial investment obligations placed on Westfield and these are helping to bring people to the area without using their cars. I don't know how bad the road traffic is in the area but I have not read any "nightmare" headlines other than not very long after Westfield opened when I think the West Cross route got jammed up. This often happens as people go for the first "look see" visit. The road network of the area is a solid jam when Westfield closes. IMO the jam should be kept inside the car parks so it doesn't bother anyone else. Since the capacity of the road network is known, allowing cars out of Westfield too quickly seems pointless and avoidable. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote on 25 October
2009 14:52:03 ... Paul Corfield wrote: You could argue that the planning requirements are therefore working. There were substantial investment obligations placed on Westfield and these are helping to bring people to the area without using their cars. I don't know how bad the road traffic is in the area but I have not read any "nightmare" headlines other than not very long after Westfield opened when I think the West Cross route got jammed up. This often happens as people go for the first "look see" visit. The road network of the area is a solid jam when Westfield closes. IMO the jam should be kept inside the car parks so it doesn't bother anyone else. Since the capacity of the road network is known, allowing cars out of Westfield too quickly seems pointless and avoidable. One of the problems for local residents is Westfield visitors parking (legally or otherwise) in their streets, denying space to residents and their visitors. This must also contribute to the jams at closing time. If you limit the exit flow from the car parks, that will only encourage more drivers to park in the surrounding roads. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Oct, 14:35, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:08:47 -0000, "Chris Read" wrote: Willesden - Clapham was a 313, being the 'new trains' we are expecting shortly in Brighton. 3-NOL? Having started pretty well loaded, we were overwhelmed by the Westfield crowd at Shepherds Bush. Predominantly well-heeled looking young couples, returning with lots of boutique-style bags to Battersea, Wandsworth and the nicer bits of Surrey, I imagine. Not sure what to make of this, really. On the one hand, it's clear Westfield must have a significant public transport penetration. You could argue that the planning requirements are therefore working. There were substantial investment obligations placed on Westfield and these are helping to bring people to the area without using their cars. I don't know how bad the road traffic is in the area but I have not read any "nightmare" headlines other than not very long after Westfield opened when I think the West Cross route got jammed up. *This often happens as people go for the first "look see" visit. I still wonder if the effect of Westfield is overestimated and the effect of the interchange to the Central Line is underestimated. When I've been there, it's only ever been for the latter, and it makes the WLL hugely more useful as part of a transport network. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Corfield wrote:
If you want to see the horror effect of IKEA on public transport try to get on the 192 bus from Tottenham Hale. It can only use little midibuses and must rank as one of the most overcrowded routes I know. If only Angel Road Station was to the south of the North Circular road and actually had trains stop at it - it would provide very easy access to IKEA and the huge Tescos at Edmonton. I suspect similar IKEA horrors are inflicted on Tramlink in south London. Yes, flat pack boxed are quite common on the trams, though I've not seen it cause too much trouble (does anyone go to buy furniture at 9am?). I once saw a mattress from a double bed onboard, which must have taken some doing. What it does need is a good walking route from the trams to Ikea, and also across the main road near Waddon Marsh. -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 25, 10:35*am, Paul Corfield wrote:
Don't know about people being left behind but surely there is sufficient track / signalling capacity that if LOROL wanted to run extras then they could do so at weekends? * I suspect the Southern service is the more critical one given it was already very popular *before* Westfield opened and now it offers a direct service to a much wider catchment area. Keep in mind that Kensington Olympia's former up loop can easily be restored to add additional passing/recess capabilities on the up side of the WLL. If trains to and from Shepherd's Bush begin to non-stop Kenny O in favour of West Brompton, this may be very useful when pathing the service. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 25, 7:08*am, "Chris Read" wrote:
After a spell on the NLL sampling a 378 yesterday, I headed towards home via Willesden Junction and the West London Line. (Incidentally, I was very impressed with the Gospel Oak - *where I boarded - 'Overground effect'. Bright, well staffed, clean, felt safe etc. A far cry from the Gospel Oak I remember of yore - closed booking office, dirty, broken down Bubble Cars on the GOBLIN etc). Willesden - Clapham was a 313, being the 'new trains' we are expecting shortly in Brighton. 3-NOL? Having started pretty well loaded, we were overwhelmed by the Westfield crowd at Shepherds Bush. Predominantly well-heeled looking young couples, returning with lots of boutique-style bags to Battersea, Wandsworth and the nicer bits of Surrey, I imagine. Not sure what to make of this, really. On the one hand, it's clear Westfield must have a significant public transport penetration. Much better than the public transport disaster which is Lakeside. On the other hand, you can't shop in two places at the same time, so somewhere else must be hurting badly. Oxford Street, perhaps - and *yet again* much of central London surface transport was seriously disrupted by a march. But the tourists should keep zone 1 shopping in good health, so it must be the high streets feeling the pain. Real crush loading on leaving Olympia. The real surprise, for me, was Imperial Wharf. I expected very little patronage, the parallel being some of the stations on the DLR extensions in the early days. In fact, in my carriage alone, I reckon about 30 alighted. As we pulled into Clapham, a sizeable throng were waiting to board, albeit swelled by the Chelsea football crowd. Not the quiet backwater I remember from a decade or more ago. I imagine, as Christmas shopping ramps up, there will be people unable to board at Shepherds Bush. Does this happen already? God forbid that IKEA open a place at/near Westfield, and pax try to struggle on with self-assembly wardrobes etc........ This is good to hear. It is a pity IMHO that the West London lines has to carry such a mix of local, transit, intercity, and freight traffic. From what I have read, there is little room for more traffic. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "E27002" wrote This is good to hear. It is a pity IMHO that the West London lines has to carry such a mix of local, transit, intercity, and freight traffic. From what I have read, there is little room for more traffic. No intercity traffic any more. But LO will get a big increase in capacity when it goes to 4tph of 4 coach trains. Peter (old enough to have travelled on the train to Clapham Junction when the service was 2 trains per day, steam-hauled, on the Motorail to Fishguard, and more recently Deltic-hauled from Bromley South). |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 25, 7:40*pm, E27002 wrote:
*It is a pity IMHO that the West London lines has to carry such a mix of local, transit, intercity, and freight traffic. *From what I have read, there is little room for more traffic. In its present form, yes, although increasing linespeed, replacing the three-aspect signals with 4-aspect, reinstating the southbound loop at Olympia (as has already been mentioned), relaying the points at Olympia to allow higher-speed entry and exit to the loop (and ensuring any new loop is also so fitted) and extending the AC electrification to Shepherd's Bush (so that time need not be wasted stopped at North Pole to do the changeover) could all help to increase capacity. BTW, there are now no InterCity (or similar) trains on the line following the December 2008 timetable change when the Cross Country services to Brighton were withdrawn. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HST on west london freight line | London Transport | |||
Shepherds Bush station - West London line | London Transport | |||
West London Line - new station operating! | London Transport | |||
West London Parking for Central Line | London Transport | |||
West London Line...... Chelsea station | London Transport |