Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() About 1 more minute to go, and they will be gone. May they never darken our platforms again. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Rowland" wrote:
About 1 more minute to go, and they will be gone. May they never darken our platforms again. I have a problem now. "Connex" is a word quite easily used as an expletive[1]... with what should I replace it? [1] "Sorry I'm late, *CONNEX!*" is all that needs said, with the word Connex effectively growled... -- James Farrar | London, SE13 | |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I have stated on pervious occasions, I am a barrister. I am the contributor
to several legal practice volumes called "Atkin's Court Forms" and these contain "model" legal pleadings for lawyers to adapt in their own cases. In the current volume of "Trespass to the Person", where I have drafted a model dealing with false imprisonment of a passenger by a railway official, the fictional title of the railway company is "X.Y. Trains plc". In the previous edition, I had managed to slip in "Connem Trains plc" but I think the publishers were worried about the connection between "Connem" and "Connex", hence the more anodyne name now used. Pity! Marc. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mait001
writes false imprisonment of a passenger by a railway official, Now that I would like to see! -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ConneX have just signed a Single Union deal with SIPTU (Irelands largest
Trades Union) to cover Tram Drivers on Dublins shiny new LUAS LRT system due to begin operations next summer. The terms of the deal as reported are VERY attractive with a starting rate of ?29K P.A. The "only" downside is a No-Strike clause and binding arbitration... Now given the views expressed in this thread.....Should I be worried....????? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Nov 2003 23:18:07 +0000, Billy wrote:
ConneX have just signed a Single Union deal with SIPTU (Irelands largest Trades Union) to cover Tram Drivers on Dublins shiny new LUAS LRT system due to begin operations next summer. The terms of the deal as reported are VERY attractive with a starting rate of ?29K P.A. The "only" downside is a No-Strike clause and binding arbitration... Now given the views expressed in this thread.....Should I be worried....????? Over a no strike clause? Or over exuberant pay. If the Irish are anything like the Brits they'll ignore legally binding contracts and strike anyway, not much you can do. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mait001 wrote:
As I have stated on pervious occasions, I am a barrister. Pervious occasions? Say no more... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A good day for burying good news - ELL Phase 2 | London Transport | |||
'Good service' on the tube | London Transport | |||
Dartford via Sidcup: Connex metro = 1tph? | London Transport | |||
Good evening ladies and gentlemen | London Transport | |||
Connex Whinge | London Transport |