On Nov 6, 10:43*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote:

Could North Pole find a new life as the depot for the coming GW ML
electric trains, or as home for HS2's rolling stock?

Probably the former I should imagine, if only because it is the project
likely to happen at the earliest, by quite a few years.


But if I were the operator I'd not want my depot at the inner London
end for either the intercity or suburban operation.

BR made this mistake the last time for BedPan by placing its depot at
Cricklewood. Yes CW (as a depot) was closed because of Thameslink, but
when extra depot facilities were needed, it made more sense to build
new at the end of the route at Cauldwell and not re-open CW - which
was vacant at the time ((CW depot building has long had non rail use -
but not continuous use - it was vacant around the time Cauldwell was
announced)).

Depots are better off ''out in the sticks'' as that is by far the best
place to berth and hence maintain anything that has any kind of London
flow. This is why what is now Chiltern built at Aylesbury, SWT at
Salisbury, LM at Northampton, WC at Manchester, and so on. Even the
bulk of C2C stabling is not East Ham but Shoeburyness.

Reading is just about OK for Thames Valley EMU but no closer. IEP need
to be Bristol and/or Cardiff/Swansea.

--
Nick

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 05:27:53 -0800 (PST), D7666
wrote:

On Nov 6, 10:43*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote:

Could North Pole find a new life as the depot for the coming GW ML
electric trains, or as home for HS2's rolling stock?

Probably the former I should imagine, if only because it is the project
likely to happen at the earliest, by quite a few years.


But if I were the operator I'd not want my depot at the inner London
end for either the intercity or suburban operation.

BR made this mistake the last time for BedPan by placing its depot at
Cricklewood. Yes CW (as a depot) was closed because of Thameslink, but
when extra depot facilities were needed, it made more sense to build
new at the end of the route at Cauldwell and not re-open CW - which
was vacant at the time ((CW depot building has long had non rail use -
but not continuous use - it was vacant around the time Cauldwell was
announced)).

Depots are better off ''out in the sticks'' as that is by far the best
place to berth and hence maintain anything that has any kind of London
flow. This is why what is now Chiltern built at Aylesbury, SWT at
Salisbury, LM at Northampton, WC at Manchester, and so on. Even the
bulk of C2C stabling is not East Ham but Shoeburyness.

Reading is just about OK for Thames Valley EMU but no closer. IEP need
to be Bristol and/or Cardiff/Swansea.


Earlier this year Agility Trains (Hitachi et al) announced that the
proposed new maintenance centres for the IEP would be at North Pole
(part of site only), Reading and Bristol Parkway. These are in
addition to several upgraded existing facilities (undisclosed). Of
course this predated the GWML electrification announcement, so it
could all change

http://www.agilitytrains.com/assets/...uncement.p df.

David

On Nov 7, 7:26*pm, David Randles wrote:

Earlier this year Agility Trains (Hitachi et al) announced that the
proposed new maintenance centres for the IEP would be at North Pole
(part of site only), Reading and Bristol Parkway. These are in
addition to several upgraded existing facilities (undisclosed). Of
course this predated the GWML electrification announcement, so it
could all change

http://www.agilitytrains.com/assets/...IEP_Preferred_....

And of course no IEP has actually been ordered yet has it ???

Agility/Htchi is merely the prefered bidder.

--
Nick

"D7666" wrote in message
...
On Nov 7, 7:26 pm, David Randles wrote:

Earlier this year Agility Trains (Hitachi et al) announced that the
proposed new maintenance centres for the IEP would be at North Pole
(part of site only), Reading and Bristol Parkway. These are in
addition to several upgraded existing facilities (undisclosed). Of
course this predated the GWML electrification announcement, so it
could all change

http://www.agilitytrains.com/assets/...IEP_Preferred_....

And of course no IEP has actually been ordered yet has it ???

Agility/Htchi is merely the prefered bidder.

--
Nick



And the traffic flows for IEPs are different than for commuter/outer
suburban services; so having facilities close to the London termini will be
useful for first turn down trains, and late returning up trains.

DW downunder

D7666 wrote:

Depots are better off ''out in the sticks'' as that is by far the best
place to berth and hence maintain anything that has any kind of London
flow. This is why what is now Chiltern built at Aylesbury, SWT at
Salisbury, LM at Northampton, WC at Manchester, and so on. Even the
bulk of C2C stabling is not East Ham but Shoeburyness.

Reading is just about OK for Thames Valley EMU but no closer. IEP need
to be Bristol and/or Cardiff/Swansea.

Wouldn't manpower costs be lower if you maintained the trains in London
between the peaks, instead of in the sticks overnight?

--
We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile.

On Nov 8, 5:18*am, "Basil Jet"
wrote:

Wouldn't manpower costs be lower if you maintained the trains in London
between the peaks, instead of in the sticks overnight?

Explain then why every type if long distance stock on London radial
lines is maintained at the country end, and most outer suburban stock
is too. Your Wimbledons Selhurtst SladeGreens etc are largely inner
suburban stock depots. Yes these depots do stable main line units
(but stabling / cleaning only) and yes they have heavy repair shops,
but the work in those repair shops is not stuff that can be done
betwene peaks or overnight anyway, ususally units involved are stopped
for several days, thus its irrelevant from a traffic point of view
where the depot is.

Or are you saying they are all those TOC are wrong with London
services rolling stock based in Plymouth Bristol Norwich Manchester
Leeds Edinburgh Northampton Aylsebury Salisbury Ramsgate Brighton
Southampton. Apart from former ER operations at Hornsey Ilford and
East Ham, and they are all legacy BR depots, just about every TOC has
its main line depots away from London.

Perhaps there are reasons for this )

--
Nick

In article
,
(D7666) wrote:

On Nov 8, 5:18*am, "Basil Jet"
wrote:

Wouldn't manpower costs be lower if you maintained the trains in
London between the peaks, instead of in the sticks overnight?

Explain then why every type if long distance stock on London radial
lines is maintained at the country end, and most outer suburban stock
is too. Your Wimbledons Selhurtst SladeGreens etc are largely inner
suburban stock depots. Yes these depots do stable main line units
(but stabling / cleaning only) and yes they have heavy repair shops,
but the work in those repair shops is not stuff that can be done
betwene peaks or overnight anyway, ususally units involved are stopped
for several days, thus its irrelevant from a traffic point of view
where the depot is.

Or are you saying they are all those TOC are wrong with London
services rolling stock based in Plymouth Bristol Norwich Manchester
Leeds Edinburgh Northampton Aylsebury Salisbury Ramsgate Brighton
Southampton. Apart from former ER operations at Hornsey Ilford and
East Ham, and they are all legacy BR depots, just about every TOC has
its main line depots away from London.

Perhaps there are reasons for this )

What about Hornsey?!

--
Colin Rosenstiel

wrote in message
...
In article
,
(D7666) wrote:


Or are you saying they are all those TOC are wrong with London
services rolling stock based in Plymouth Bristol Norwich Manchester
Leeds Edinburgh Northampton Aylsebury Salisbury Ramsgate Brighton
Southampton. Apart from former ER operations at Hornsey Ilford and
East Ham, and they are all legacy BR depots, just about every TOC has
its main line depots away from London.

Perhaps there are reasons for this )

What about Hornsey?!

You didn't read to the end of Nick's post did you...

Paul S

In article ,
(Paul Scott) wrote:

wrote in message
...
In article
,
(D7666) wrote:

Or are you saying they are all those TOC are wrong with London
services rolling stock based in Plymouth Bristol Norwich Manchester
Leeds Edinburgh Northampton Aylsebury Salisbury Ramsgate Brighton
Southampton. Apart from former ER operations at Hornsey Ilford and
East Ham, and they are all legacy BR depots, just about every TOC has
its main line depots away from London.

Perhaps there are reasons for this )

What about Hornsey?!

You didn't read to the end of Nick's post did you...

Oops! However, he makes my point for me. I mentioned Hornsey because it
has one of the highest reliability records of any modern EMU depot.
Compare the past record with the same class 365 stock of the Kent coast
depots.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On 8 Nov, 12:29, wrote:
In article ,





(Paul Scott) wrote:
wrote in message
...
In article
,
(D7666) wrote:

Or are you saying they are all those TOC are wrong *with London
services rolling stock based in Plymouth Bristol Norwich Manchester
Leeds Edinburgh Northampton Aylsebury Salisbury Ramsgate Brighton
Southampton. Apart from former ER operations at Hornsey Ilford and
East Ham, and they are all legacy BR depots, just about every TOC has
its main line depots away from London.

Perhaps there are reasons for this )

What about Hornsey?!

You didn't read to the end of Nick's post did you...

Oops! However, he makes my point for me. I mentioned Hornsey because it
has one of the highest reliability records of any modern EMU depot.
Compare the past record with the same class 365 stock of the Kent coast
depots.

I seem to recall that the 365s were maintained at Slade Green,
presumably because the fleet was small and similar to the rest of what
was maintained at Slade Green.