In article
,
(D7666) wrote:

On Nov 8, 5:18*am, "Basil Jet"
wrote:

Wouldn't manpower costs be lower if you maintained the trains in
London between the peaks, instead of in the sticks overnight?

Explain then why every type if long distance stock on London radial
lines is maintained at the country end, and most outer suburban stock
is too. Your Wimbledons Selhurtst SladeGreens etc are largely inner
suburban stock depots. Yes these depots do stable main line units
(but stabling / cleaning only) and yes they have heavy repair shops,
but the work in those repair shops is not stuff that can be done
betwene peaks or overnight anyway, ususally units involved are stopped
for several days, thus its irrelevant from a traffic point of view
where the depot is.

Or are you saying they are all those TOC are wrong with London
services rolling stock based in Plymouth Bristol Norwich Manchester
Leeds Edinburgh Northampton Aylsebury Salisbury Ramsgate Brighton
Southampton. Apart from former ER operations at Hornsey Ilford and
East Ham, and they are all legacy BR depots, just about every TOC has
its main line depots away from London.

Perhaps there are reasons for this )

What about Hornsey?!

--
Colin Rosenstiel

wrote in message
...
In article
,
(D7666) wrote:


Or are you saying they are all those TOC are wrong with London
services rolling stock based in Plymouth Bristol Norwich Manchester
Leeds Edinburgh Northampton Aylsebury Salisbury Ramsgate Brighton
Southampton. Apart from former ER operations at Hornsey Ilford and
East Ham, and they are all legacy BR depots, just about every TOC has
its main line depots away from London.

Perhaps there are reasons for this )

What about Hornsey?!

You didn't read to the end of Nick's post did you...

Paul S

In article ,
(Paul Scott) wrote:

wrote in message
...
In article
,
(D7666) wrote:

Or are you saying they are all those TOC are wrong with London
services rolling stock based in Plymouth Bristol Norwich Manchester
Leeds Edinburgh Northampton Aylsebury Salisbury Ramsgate Brighton
Southampton. Apart from former ER operations at Hornsey Ilford and
East Ham, and they are all legacy BR depots, just about every TOC has
its main line depots away from London.

Perhaps there are reasons for this )

What about Hornsey?!

You didn't read to the end of Nick's post did you...

Oops! However, he makes my point for me. I mentioned Hornsey because it
has one of the highest reliability records of any modern EMU depot.
Compare the past record with the same class 365 stock of the Kent coast
depots.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On 8 Nov, 12:29, wrote:
In article ,





(Paul Scott) wrote:
wrote in message
...
In article
,
(D7666) wrote:

Or are you saying they are all those TOC are wrong *with London
services rolling stock based in Plymouth Bristol Norwich Manchester
Leeds Edinburgh Northampton Aylsebury Salisbury Ramsgate Brighton
Southampton. Apart from former ER operations at Hornsey Ilford and
East Ham, and they are all legacy BR depots, just about every TOC has
its main line depots away from London.

Perhaps there are reasons for this )

What about Hornsey?!

You didn't read to the end of Nick's post did you...

Oops! However, he makes my point for me. I mentioned Hornsey because it
has one of the highest reliability records of any modern EMU depot.
Compare the past record with the same class 365 stock of the Kent coast
depots.

I seem to recall that the 365s were maintained at Slade Green,
presumably because the fleet was small and similar to the rest of what
was maintained at Slade Green.