Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message of Tue, 10
Nov 2009 18:02:31 in uk.transport.london, writes [snip] This would also appear to be because the Journey Planner thinks there will still be a Circle Line service from king's Cross to High St Kensington on 14 December! Bloody useless! I phoned LU CSC after reading Colin's posting. The clerk got back to me the next day to say the data would be loaded this week. The good news is that there is now data reflecting the increased H&C frequency on stations west of Paddington. The bad news is that about 5 minutes journey time has been added between Royal Oak and Moorgate. http://journeyplanner.tfl.gov.uk/use...language=en&se ssionID=0&ptOptionsActive=-1&type_destination=stop&name_destination=MOOR GATE&type_origin=stop&name_origin=royal%20oak&itdD ate=20091118&itdTime=9 54&itdTripDateTimeDepArr=arr uses the current data on 20091118 and shows 8-9 minute headways and journeys of 19-20 minutes. http://journeyplanner.tfl.gov.uk/use...language=en&se ssionID=0&ptOptionsActive=-1&type_destination=stop&name_destination=MOOR GATE&type_origin=stop&name_origin=royal%20oak&itdD ate=20091218&itdTime=9 54&itdTripDateTimeDepArr=arr is the same enquiry on 20091218 and shows 5 minute headways and journeys of 26-27 minutes. Both are weekday enquiries at the same time. YMMV. I have sometimes found journey planner enquiries are not repeatable. I say nothing about the service. ![]() (A minimum change Bayswater - Baker Street journey on 20091218 shows as costing 56 minutes. ![]() I guess I shall be back on the phone, tomorrow. ![]() (LUCSC staffs its phones 08.00-20.00) -- Walter Briscoe |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walter Briscoe wrote in
: I phoned LU CSC after reading Colin's posting. The clerk got back to me the next day to say the data would be loaded this week. The good news is that there is now data reflecting the increased H&C frequency on stations west of Paddington. The bad news is that about 5 minutes journey time has been added between Royal Oak and Moorgate. http://journeyplanner.tfl.gov.uk/use...?language=en&s e ssionID=0&ptOptionsActive=-1&type_destination=stop&name_destination=MOO R GATE&type_origin=stop&name_origin=royal%20oak&itdD ate=20091118&itdTime= 9 54&itdTripDateTimeDepArr=arr uses the current data on 20091118 and shows 8-9 minute headways and journeys of 19-20 minutes. http://journeyplanner.tfl.gov.uk/use...?language=en&s e ssionID=0&ptOptionsActive=-1&type_destination=stop&name_destination=MOO R GATE&type_origin=stop&name_origin=royal%20oak&itdD ate=20091218&itdTime= 9 54&itdTripDateTimeDepArr=arr is the same enquiry on 20091218 and shows 5 minute headways and journeys of 26-27 minutes. Both are weekday enquiries at the same time. YMMV. I have sometimes found journey planner enquiries are not repeatable. I say nothing about the service. ![]() It seems the journey time has been padded for the peaks. Off peak is shown as 20 minutes, as now. Given the chaotic nature of the service currently during the peak hour this is unfortunate but not unreasonable. (A minimum change Bayswater - Baker Street journey on 20091218 shows as costing 56 minutes. ![]() 50 minutes off peak. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . 145,
pleasereplytogroup (David Jackman) wrote: (A minimum change Bayswater - Baker Street journey on 20091218 shows as costing 56 minutes. ![]() 50 minutes off peak. ?Que? That's just three stations, maybe 6 minutes, now. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message of Tue, 17 Nov 2009
23:33:23 in uk.transport.london, Walter Briscoe writes [snipped a description that the Journey Planner shows slower services on the extended Circle line than those which apply now.] I guess I shall be back on the phone, tomorrow. ![]() (LUCSC staffs its phones 08.00-20.00) I now have a good reply from LUCSC which I show below: For some time we’ve had the problem that our timetables assume it takes trains the same amount of time to make a journey at all times day. In fact, of course, trains travel more slowly at peak times, as it takes people longer to get on and off at stations. The increased weight caused by fuller loadings also has an effect. New technology has enabled us accurately to measure this variation for the first time, and we’ve taken it into account when planning the December Circle line timetable. The figures provided for 13 December onwards more accurately reflect differing actual journey times across the day and will therefore provide a better indication to customers of how much time to allow when planning their journeys. Conversely, the journey time figures provided at the moment are broadly reliable at off-peak times, but may vary considerably from customers’ experience during the rush hour. So new sample journey times for a Royal Oak – Moorgate journey a AM peak (0830) – 25-26 minutes Inter-peak (1300) – 20 minutes PM peak (1730) – 23-24 minutes Evening (2130) – 20 minutes Weekend (Sat, 1100) – 20 minutes We have recently introduced the same measure on the Northern and Piccadilly lines, and have seen an improvement in reliability of the information provided as a result. It should be noted that this measure is separate to the Circle line route change – it is merely coincidence that the two are being introduced at the same time. -- Walter Briscoe |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 15:46:28 on Tue, 24
Nov 2009, Walter Briscoe remarked: For some time we’ve had the problem that our timetables assume it takes trains the same amount of time to make a journey at all times day. In fact, of course, trains travel more slowly at peak times, as it takes people longer to get on and off at stations. The increased weight caused by fuller loadings also has an effect. New technology has enabled us accurately to measure this variation for the first time, They've thrown away the sundial and bought a stopwatch? and we’ve taken it into account when planning the December Circle line timetable. Hooray! -- Roland Perry |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:33:33 -0800 (PST), "
wrote: Revised maps etc. at http://www.tfl.gov.uk/gettingaround/13280.aspx Changing at Edgware Road made to seem like a piece of cake in the blurb. If the train destination blind shows Edgware Road, and you want to og East, get on it but be prepared to get off if it changes to Hammersmith. If the blind show Hammersmith toss a coin to decide whether or not to join the train.. If you then find yourself at the wrong Paddington station improve your health by taking a long walk to the other staion. (I hope this an official out-station interchange?) -- Peter Lawrence |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Lawrence" wrote
If the train destination blind shows Edgware Road, and you want to og East, get on it but be prepared to get off if it changes to Hammersmith. If the blind show Hammersmith toss a coin to decide whether or not to join the train.. If you then find yourself at the wrong Paddington station improve your health by taking a long walk to the other staion. (I hope this an official out-station interchange?) None of that makes any sense to me at all. Where are you starting from? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Salmon" wrote in message ... "Peter Lawrence" wrote If the train destination blind shows Edgware Road, and you want to og East, get on it but be prepared to get off if it changes to Hammersmith. If the blind show Hammersmith toss a coin to decide whether or not to join the train.. If you then find yourself at the wrong Paddington station improve your health by taking a long walk to the other staion. (I hope this an official out-station interchange?) None of that makes any sense to me at all. Where are you starting from? I think he's suggesting (wrongly, or tongue in cheek?) that all Circle trains will run with either Edgware or Hammersmith on the front. But the blinds are definitely being changed en route according to posters elsewhere. A train leaving Edgware for the inner rail is supposed to be showing Circle via xxx. A through train arriving at Edgware from Hammersmith is expected to show Circle via Aldgate AIUI. Trains leaving for Hammersmith westbound will show Hammersmith - AIUI they will have displayed this from Liverpool St onwards, so westbound H&C and CIrcle trains along the top of the circle will all have the same destination showing. Paul S |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Nov, 12:34, "Paul Scott" wrote:
But the blinds are definitely being changed en route according to posters elsewhere. A train leaving Edgware for the inner rail is supposed to be showing Circle via xxx. A through train arriving at Edgware from Hammersmith is expected to show Circle via Aldgate AIUI. Trains leaving for Hammersmith westbound will show Hammersmith - AIUI they will have displayed this from Liverpool St onwards, so westbound H&C and CIrcle trains along the top of the circle will all have the same destination showing. As a "union guy" once memorably observed (about something totally different) "that's all very well on paper but it'll never work in theory". If we are relying on train operators memories/willpower to manually wind blinds at intermediate locations such as Liverpool Street I think we may be a bit optimistic in imagining it will actually happen with much consistancy. -- gordon |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Walton-on-Thames railway station no longer a bus teacup. | London Transport | |||
So what's going wrong with the Jubilee line? | London Transport | |||
teacup | London Transport | |||
Is the teacup necessary? | London Transport | |||
Oyster Prepay capping publicity | London Transport |