Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 Nov, 19:30, Paul Terry wrote:
In message , MIG writes I am not convinced of the need for increased frequency to Hammersmith, and wonder if it was just a consequence. Passenger numbers at Hammersmith (H&C) rose from 6.8 million in 2007 to 9.2 million in 2008 - the new total is pretty much the same as those who used Heathrow Terminals 1,2,3 and 4 combined. Compare the Northern Line terminus at Morden, which sees only 6.65 million. Add an alternating Hammersmith - Edgware Road shuttle then*. Even with increased demand on the Hammersmith line used to justify the current proposal, I don't see why it outweighs the impossible demands that will be put on Paddington and Edgware Road and the loss of convenient routes round the top left corner of the Circle. Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease. *No more terminating than in the Teacup proposal, but without the need to worry about platforms, because both Hammersmith and Wimble would offer some through trains for those who need them. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Walton-on-Thames railway station no longer a bus teacup. | London Transport | |||
So what's going wrong with the Jubilee line? | London Transport | |||
teacup | London Transport | |||
Is the teacup necessary? | London Transport | |||
Oyster Prepay capping publicity | London Transport |