On Nov 11, 10:21*pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
I prefer the elegant clarity of the New Adlestrop Rail Atlas:
http://www.systemed.net/atlas/

Thanks! Coincidentally I've been doing a bunch of work on the New
Adlestrop this evening.

I'm hoping to have a release with coverage extending as far as an east-
west line starting at Leyland, and ending at the Humber, pretty soon
now. I might then start a separate sheet north of there, as the
Illustrator file is getting _really_ slow to edit...

Richard

Richard Fairhurst wrote (apparently) in uk.railway on Thu 12 Nov
2009 00:55:55:

On Nov 11, 10:21*pm, Tom Anderson wrote:
I prefer the elegant clarity of the New Adlestrop Rail Atlas:
http://www.systemed.net/atlas/

Thanks! Coincidentally I've been doing a bunch of work on the
New Adlestrop this evening.

I'm hoping to have a release with coverage extending as far as an
east- west line starting at Leyland, and ending at the Humber,
pretty soon now. I might then start a separate sheet north of
there, as the Illustrator file is getting _really_ slow to
edit...

Richard

Guess that's not going to have anything west of Marston Moor on the
Harrogate line but will continue to keep an eye on it, as I have been
doing for a couple of years. It's extremely useful for the areas
covered so far though.

Thanks!
--
MrGuest
Always, seemingly, on the road to nowhere

Mr Guest wrote:
Guess that's not going to have anything west of Marston Moor on the
Harrogate line but will continue to keep an eye on it, as I have been
doing for a couple of years. It's extremely useful for the areas
covered so far though.

Once I'm clear of the Pennines it'll be plain sailing up to the
Edinburgh-Glasgow belt. It's the really dense areas that take the time
- both in terms of research and cartography. Dewsbury has not been a
bunch of fun and I'm not looking forward to Leeds in the next-but-one
release...

Ricard

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:22 -0000, "Peter Andrews"
wrote:

Wow, congratulations a lot of work!


Agreed, and the idea of releasing a draft copy for comment - and
getting it very thoroughly proof checked for free in the process -
shows an awful lot of imagination.

On Nov 12, 12:44*pm, Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:22 -0000, "Peter Andrews"

wrote:

Wow, congratulations a lot of work!

Agreed, and the idea of releasing a draft copy for comment - and
getting it very thoroughly proof checked for free in the process -
shows an awful lot of imagination.

And there is one train a day direct from Woking to Staines round the
north to west curve at Byfleet/Weybridge

Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:22 -0000, "Peter Andrews"
wrote:

Wow, congratulations a lot of work!


Agreed, and the idea of releasing a draft copy for comment - and
getting it very thoroughly proof checked for free in the process -
shows an awful lot of imagination.

Unless he's planning to sell it, why shouldn't he do that?

--
We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile.

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:22:38 -0000, "Basil Jet"
wrote:
Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:22 -0000, "Peter Andrews"
wrote:

Wow, congratulations a lot of work!


Agreed, and the idea of releasing a draft copy for comment - and
getting it very thoroughly proof checked for free in the process -
shows an awful lot of imagination.

Unless he's planning to sell it, why shouldn't he do that?


Where did I suggest that he shouldn't?

Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:22:38 -0000, "Basil Jet"
wrote:
Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:22 -0000, "Peter Andrews"
wrote:

Wow, congratulations a lot of work!


Agreed, and the idea of releasing a draft copy for comment - and
getting it very thoroughly proof checked for free in the process -
shows an awful lot of imagination.

Unless he's planning to sell it, why shouldn't he do that?

Where did I suggest that he shouldn't?

Where did I suggest that you suggested that he shouldn't?

--
We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile.

On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:47:12 -0800 (PST), JohnnPam wrote:

And there is one train a day direct from Woking to Staines round the
north to west curve at Byfleet/Weybridge

This service now runs all day on Sundays.

Basil Jet wrote on 12 November
2009 14:40:28 ...
Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:22:38 -0000, "Basil Jet"
wrote:
Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:22 -0000, "Peter Andrews"
wrote:

Wow, congratulations a lot of work!

Agreed, and the idea of releasing a draft copy for comment - and
getting it very thoroughly proof checked for free in the process -
shows an awful lot of imagination.

Unless he's planning to sell it, why shouldn't he do that?

Where did I suggest that he shouldn't?

Where did I suggest that you suggested that he shouldn't?

It's implied by asking "why shouldn't he do that?". And even if he *is*
planning to sell it, what's wrong with getting it proof-checked for
free? Are you suggesting he would then be crossing some sort of ethical
boundary? Good luck to him, I say.

--
Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)