Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Paul Scott
writes Network Rail's press release shows the track work in progress, I can't work out from the pic if they've laid two tracks or just the one. Can anyone clarify? I doubt that "normal service" could be restored with single-line working so, while it is difficult to be sure, it looks to me as though they have laid one new track on the south side, which will become the temporary down line, and they are checking the gauge of the old down line, which will become the temporary up line. If I'm right this presumably means that the infrastructure damage is limited to the arch on the north side (left side in the latest photo), and that it has been determined that the rest of the tunnel under the line is OK. -- Paul Terry |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Terry" wrote in message ... In message , Paul Scott writes Network Rail's press release shows the track work in progress, I can't work out from the pic if they've laid two tracks or just the one. Can anyone clarify? I doubt that "normal service" could be restored with single-line working so, while it is difficult to be sure, it looks to me as though they have laid one new track on the south side, which will become the temporary down line, and they are checking the gauge of the old down line, which will become the temporary up line. If I'm right this presumably means that the infrastructure damage is limited to the arch on the north side (left side in the latest photo), and that it has been determined that the rest of the tunnel under the line is OK. I'm pretty sure it is two new tracks now. Those location boxes and the concrete troughing look as though they are in the original position., Aerial views show them on the down side at that point. In other forums they are saying the speed limit will be 20 mph, so that will affect timings, but it should still be a full capacity route. Paul |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Bondee) wrote: "CJB" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 4:27 pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: Latest report is that normal service will resume tomorrow morning: http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/eng...a1d1349548b8fa aad06\961215 Network Rail's press release shows the track work in progress, I can't work out from the pic if they've laid two tracks or just the one. Can anyone clarify? I'll let you know tomorrow. Looks like the commute will take a little longer than usual, but not as long as it did last week. : ) There will be a TSR at the site I expect but I doubt it will cost enough time to cause trains to be non-trivially late. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Paul Scott) wrote: Latest report is that normal service will resume tomorrow morning: http://www.southwesttrains.co.uk/eng...a1d1349548b8fa aad06\961215 Network Rail's press release shows the track work in progress, I can't work out from the pic if they've laid two tracks or just the one. Can anyone clarify? http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co...eleaseID=4827& NewsA\reaID=2&SearchCategoryID=8 That page includes this text: "Network Rail engineers will continue to work around the clock and over the weekend to design and build a small, temporary loop around the section of track above the damaged arch on the adjacent land which was once occupied by the Feltham marshalling yard. This will allow trains to cross the river safely while repairs to the permanent structure are carried out." If you look at the full size picture (on the download link) you can see more clearly that the track has been slewed. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 22, 7:10*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote: "Paul Terry" wrote in message ... In message , Paul Scott writes Network Rail's press release shows the track work in progress, I can't work out from the pic if they've laid two tracks or just the one. Can anyone clarify? I doubt that "normal service" could be restored with single-line working so, while it is difficult to be sure, it looks to me as though they have laid one new track on the south side, which will become the temporary down line, and they are checking the gauge of the old down line, which will become the temporary up line. If I'm right this presumably means that the infrastructure damage is limited to the arch on the north side (left side in the latest photo), and that it has been determined that the rest of the tunnel under the line is OK. I'm pretty sure it is two new tracks now. Those location boxes and the concrete troughing look as though they are in the original position., Aerial views show them on the down side at that point. * In other forums they are saying the speed limit will be 20 mph, so that will affect timings, but it should still be a full capacity route. Paul- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Today went from Feltham to Waterloo. The 3'rd rail track is slewed to the south over what looks like a new embankment - which would include a tunnel for the errant stream. Despite the 20 mph signs at the west end of the London platform at Feltham and also just before the works - the train I was on must have been going at least 25-30. The new up line is merged to the previous down, and the new down is on the new formation. The slew is quite long so trains can proceed quite fast and without stopping. The old rails of the previous up line are very rusty even from a few days of non-use. CJB. |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce" wrote in message ... On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:02:37 -0000, "Paul Scott" wrote: A good quality picture of the failure has appeared on the Network Rail site now: http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/servic...idge_Nov09.JPG A couple of tubes of decorator's filler, and the job's a good 'un. Didn't Bouch use something of the kind to mask defects in the Tay Bridge? Peter |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Didn't Bouch use something of the kind to mask defects in the Tay Bridge? Peter Linseed Putty I believe ... Hth C. |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CJB" wrote in message
... ...Today went from Feltham to Waterloo... Whereas today, there may have been many extra passengers *into* Feltham, for the unveiling of the Freddie Mercury Memorial, on the 18th anniversary of his death, unveiled by his mother and Brian May. |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CJB" wrote in message
....The new up line is merged to the previous down, and the new down is on the new formation. The slew is quite long so trains can proceed quite fast and without stopping. The old rails of the previous up line are very rusty even from a few days of non-use. CJB. You need to look again I'm afraid. From a down train you can clearly see three lines, the temporary up, and the two original. The remnants of the old up line are significantly longer than the remaining length of down line though, for obvious reasons... Paul S |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... "CJB" wrote in message ....The new up line is merged to the previous down, and the new down is on the new formation. The slew is quite long so trains can proceed quite fast and without stopping. The old rails of the previous up line are very rusty even from a few days of non-use. CJB. You need to look again I'm afraid. From a down train you can clearly see three lines, the temporary up, and the two original. The remnants of the old up line are significantly longer than the remaining length of down line though, for obvious reasons... Yep, that's exactly what I was about to report. The "slight detour" is hardly noticeable. My journeys don't seem to have been affected at all. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Changes at Feltham | London Transport | |||
SWT Closes Platform 1 Entrance/Exit at Feltham at 23.00 | London Transport | |||
Disruption between Feltham and Twickenham today (and for a long period thereafter) | London Transport | |||
Relaunched trivia: Unusual vehicles at Feltham Goods Yard | London Transport | |||
DLR Service Disruption | London Transport |